Detailed Abstract
[BP Best Oral Presentation - Biliary & Pancreas (Pancreas Disease/Surgery)]
[BP BEST OP 7] Comparison of survival outcomes between radical antegrade modular pancreato-splenectomy (RAMPS) and conventional distal pancreato-splenectomy for pancreatic body and tail cancer
Hee Joon KIM*1 , Sung Yeol YU1 , Sang Hyun SHIN2 , Jae Woo KWON2 , Hui Song LEE7 , Hong Beom KIM2 , Sung Hyun KIM3 , Jae Do YANG4 , Woo Hyung LEE5 , Jun Suh LEE6
1 Division Of HBP Surgery, Department Of Surgery, Chonnam National University Medical School, REPUBLIC OF KOREA
2 Department Of Surgery, School Of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University, REPUBLIC OF KOREA
3 Department Of Surgery, School Of Medicine, Yonsei University, REPUBLIC OF KOREA
4 Department Of Surgery, School Of Medicine, Jeonbuk National University, REPUBLIC OF KOREA
5 Department Of Surgery, School Of Medicine, Ulsan University, REPUBLIC OF KOREA
6 Department Of Surgery, School Of Medicine, Seoul National University, REPUBLIC OF KOREA
7 Department Of Surgery, School Of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, REPUBLIC OF KOREA
Background : Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) is a modification of distal pancreatectomy for complete N1 lymph node dissection and adequate posterior margin. The ultimate goal is an improvement of survival in left-side pancreatic cancer. However, the survival benefit of the RAMPS is unclear. Aim of this study is to evaluate the survival benefit of RAMPS, compared to conventional distal pancreatectomy (cDP).
Methods : A retrospective analysis of 333 patients who underwent RAMPS or cDP for left-sided pancreatic cancer at Chonnam National University Hospital, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Seoul Samsung Medical center, Gangbuk Samsung Medical center, and Ehwa University Mokdong Hospital from 2010 to 2019 was performed. After propensity score matching, we compared survival and operative outcomes, including blood loss, hospital stay, and morbidity between RAMPS and cDP. Prognostic factors were also analyzed.
Results : After 1:1 PSM, ninety-nine patients were included in each group. Retrieved lymph nodes count was higher in RAMPS (median, 15 vs. 10, p<0.001) compared to cDP. No significant differences in R0 resection rate, blood loss, hospital stay, and morbidity were observed between both groups. Overall survival (72.9 months vs 69.0 months, P=0.760), and disease-free survival (36.3 months vs 31.5 months, P=0.743) was comparable in both groups. In multivariate analysis, independent significant prognostic factors were poorly or undifferentiated histologic differentiation (HR=3.090, p=0.004), N-stage and adjuvant treatment (HR=2.183, p=0.001) for overall survival.
Conclusions : RAMPS was associated with high retrieved lymph node count, however, it did not affect to overall and disease-free survival. Histological differentiation, N-stage and adjuvant treatment were independent significant prognostic factors rather than operation type.
Methods : A retrospective analysis of 333 patients who underwent RAMPS or cDP for left-sided pancreatic cancer at Chonnam National University Hospital, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Seoul Samsung Medical center, Gangbuk Samsung Medical center, and Ehwa University Mokdong Hospital from 2010 to 2019 was performed. After propensity score matching, we compared survival and operative outcomes, including blood loss, hospital stay, and morbidity between RAMPS and cDP. Prognostic factors were also analyzed.
Results : After 1:1 PSM, ninety-nine patients were included in each group. Retrieved lymph nodes count was higher in RAMPS (median, 15 vs. 10, p<0.001) compared to cDP. No significant differences in R0 resection rate, blood loss, hospital stay, and morbidity were observed between both groups. Overall survival (72.9 months vs 69.0 months, P=0.760), and disease-free survival (36.3 months vs 31.5 months, P=0.743) was comparable in both groups. In multivariate analysis, independent significant prognostic factors were poorly or undifferentiated histologic differentiation (HR=3.090, p=0.004), N-stage and adjuvant treatment (HR=2.183, p=0.001) for overall survival.
Conclusions : RAMPS was associated with high retrieved lymph node count, however, it did not affect to overall and disease-free survival. Histological differentiation, N-stage and adjuvant treatment were independent significant prognostic factors rather than operation type.
SESSION
BP Best Oral Presentation
Room A 3/23/2023 11:00 AM - 12:10 PM